OMNICHANNEL: WHEN THE INVENTORY CEASES TO BELONG TO A SINGLE CHANNEL

For years, many companies treated their sales channels as if they were separate businesses. Brick-and-mortar stores on one side, e-commerce on another, and in some cases marketplaces operating almost independently. That fragmentation worked when digital volume was marginal. Today, with sustained online growth and consumers moving seamlessly across channels within the same purchase journey, that model has become expensive and inefficient.

In Mexico, e-commerce is no longer a complementary channel. Official estimates show that digital commerce already represents a meaningful share of economic activity, and in retail specifically, online sales continue to grow at double-digit rates. The operational takeaway is straightforward: consumers now shop across multiple channels, but they expect a single, consistent experience.

‍

One Inventory, Multiple Promises

At the core of omnichannel execution lies inventory. When each channel “owns” its own stock, artificial stockouts emerge. A store may have available units while the website shows no availability, or the opposite. This fragmentation forces companies to duplicate safety stock, increases working capital requirements, and weakens the customer promise.

A mature omnichannel approach treats inventory as a shared asset, visible in real time and governed by clear allocation rules. Integration does not mean removing all constraints. It means defining priorities. For example, protecting store shelves to avoid in-store stockouts, while allowing e-commerce orders to consume store inventory when rotation, seasonality, or service level justify it. Well-designed omnichannel models do not eliminate rules. They make them explicit, measurable, and predictable.

‍

The Role of the WMS in Customer Experience

In omnichannel operations, customers do not see systems. They see promises: delivered tomorrow, ready for pickup today, easy to return. Meeting those promises depends on invisible decisions made before the order ships, such as where to fulfill from, which orders to prioritize, and how to prevent one channel from consuming inventory already committed to another.

This is where the Warehouse Management System, and its coordination with an Order Management System when present, becomes the operational referee. In models such as ship-from-store or click and collect, complexity increases even further. Stores stop being only sales points and become fulfillment nodes, requiring picking, staging, and control processes traditionally associated with distribution centers.

Even with the right technology in place, friction appears when operations are not standardized. Orders get lost in backrooms, inventory is not deducted on time, or preparation times fail to match the commercial promise. The gap between system logic and floor execution becomes visible to the customer almost immediately.

‍

The Hybrid Consumer Changes the Logistics Equation

Omnichannel accelerated because consumers became hybrid. They browse online, buy in-store, pick up at the store, or return through a different channel than the original purchase. Demand no longer behaves like two separate rivers. It is a single flow that constantly changes direction.

Operationally, this diversifies the final leg of delivery. Last mile is no longer only home delivery. It includes store pickup, pickup points, and cross-channel returns. Each option carries a different cost structure, but customers perceive them as one brand either delivering or failing. Companies that do not design this mix properly end up paying through urgency: expedited shipments to meet promises, extra labor in stores, and returns that come back without a clear processing path.

‍

Hidden Costs of Poorly Designed Omnichannel Models

Poorly implemented omnichannel strategies often look successful in terms of sales, but unstable in terms of margin. The usual cause is the lack of clear operating rules. Orders that switch fulfillment origin at the last minute, constant replanning, improvised picking in stores, and slow return processing all push unit costs higher. Volume grows, but operations operate in corrective mode.

Another hidden cost is immobilized inventory caused by inaccuracy. If a store shows available inventory that cannot be physically located, e-commerce compensates by shipping from a more distant node or canceling orders altogether. Omnichannel execution punishes inaccuracy because each error affects multiple channels simultaneously.

‍

The Store as a Logistics Node

Increasingly, physical stores function as micro distribution centers. This brings inventory closer to the customer and reduces delivery times without relying solely on long-distance transport. However, it requires a redesign of store operations: dedicated areas, preparation schedules, training, quality control, and fulfillment metrics.

When executed correctly, the store becomes a strategic asset in the network. When executed poorly, it becomes overloaded, floor service deteriorates, and omnichannel competes against itself. The key is governance. Stores should not be asked to do everything, but to do what they can execute consistently.

‍

Selling Everywhere Requires Operating as One

Omnichannel is not a commercial strategy. It is an operational one. Its success depends less on the number of channels and more on the ability to coordinate inventory, systems, and decisions in real time. When that coordination exists, inventory stops being a constraint and becomes a lever. Capital is used more efficiently, promises are met, and demand peaks are absorbed without crisis.

Companies that understand this can scale without losing control. Those that do not discover that selling through more channels can also mean more friction, higher hidden costs, and thinner margins. In modern retail, the advantage is not being everywhere. It is fulfilling from anywhere with the same level of precision.